Part 04.
It was basically explained that if an event ''A'' must happen, before another event ''D'' happens then ''D'' cannot happen without ''A'', and this is a precondition that event ''A'' does cause event ''D'' to happen such that when event ''A'' happens, it is a cert that event ''D'' happens.
Such is this, that there are 3 basic outcomes to this ''logic'' relationship. There is a fourth outcome but it was an outcome; one that could be substantiated, yet was logically incoherent.
The above outcome, at the very top of this page, was deemed as the preferred first one. The second outcome was; event ''A'' happens but event ''D'' does not happen, or in the least, it; the event ''D,'' could potentially happen, but does not happen, or is yet to happen.
This here was the conclusion yet, but an extraction from the ''logic'' relationship at the very top of this page, as but one of the three or four possible outcomes, postulated from the same ''logic'' relationship at the very top of this page, because in essence one could not be excluded from the other. This is being that the conclusion that event ''A'' happens but event ''D'' does not happen; could potentially or is yet to happen, was but one of the three or four possible outcomes of the ''logic'' relationship. But then is the conclusive outcome of the three or four outcomes.
This is because the very basis of the arguement which was the ''logic'' relationship between cause and effect phaenomenon with regards to the logic behind set theorem, explaining cause and effect phaenomenon was brought up by Professor Kompf to explain to himself and any one his basic understanding of what it was before the universe was created and what it was his expectations were, about what or how it is when the universe ends.......if it does.
It was basically explained that if an event ''A'' must happen, before another event ''D'' happens then ''D'' cannot happen without ''A'', and this is a precondition that event ''A'' does cause event ''D'' to happen such that when event ''A'' happens, it is a cert that event ''D'' happens.
Such is this, that there are 3 basic outcomes to this ''logic'' relationship. There is a fourth outcome but it was an outcome; one that could be substantiated, yet was logically incoherent.
The above outcome, at the very top of this page, was deemed as the preferred first one. The second outcome was; event ''A'' happens but event ''D'' does not happen, or in the least, it; the event ''D,'' could potentially happen, but does not happen, or is yet to happen.
This here was the conclusion yet, but an extraction from the ''logic'' relationship at the very top of this page, as but one of the three or four possible outcomes, postulated from the same ''logic'' relationship at the very top of this page, because in essence one could not be excluded from the other. This is being that the conclusion that event ''A'' happens but event ''D'' does not happen; could potentially or is yet to happen, was but one of the three or four possible outcomes of the ''logic'' relationship. But then is the conclusive outcome of the three or four outcomes.
This is because the very basis of the arguement which was the ''logic'' relationship between cause and effect phaenomenon with regards to the logic behind set theorem, explaining cause and effect phaenomenon was brought up by Professor Kompf to explain to himself and any one his basic understanding of what it was before the universe was created and what it was his expectations were, about what or how it is when the universe ends.......if it does.
Comments
Post a Comment